Compared to common barnyard ducks, the extinct ducks of
Hawaii were short-beaked, pot-bellied, and even less graceful. They were
Hawaii’s own version of another famous flightless island-dweller, the dodo:
descended from ancestors who could fly, they evolved to fill the niche as the
island’s main herbivores. Unfortunately, the fate of Hawaii’s ducks followed
that of the dodo. Shortly after the arrival of humans, these wonderfully
bizarre birds vanished from their island paradise.
Moa-nalos: the
turtle-jawed and stumbling pot-bellied ducks
The biggest of the Hawaiian ducks were the moa-nalos, a
name formed from the Hawaiian words moa
(“fowl”) and nalo (“lost”). (James
& Olson, 1991)The word moa will
appear familiar to those interested in extinct island birds, as the huge
ratites of New Zealand shared this name. And, like the moas of New Zealand,
these birds were equipped for a life on the ground.
The moa-nalos displayed extremely robust legs and hips,
as well as wings and keels reduced beyond use. With the exception of one species,
moa-nalos also sported large, tooth-like ridges in their bills, perfect for
grinding vegetation. All species probably lacked webbing on their feet,
allowing them to lead a life on land with greater ease. Four species,
consisting of three genera, have been discovered thus far.
The nearly-unpronounceable Chelychelynechen quassus, found on Kauai, translates to “broken
turtle-jawed goose,” in reference to its extremely shortened bill and the
locality of the original fossils: in the middle of a jeep trail. The remains
were found in a shattered state due to the passing of cars overhead. C. quassus is the aforementioned token
species which lacks the toothy ridges present in other species. This is likely
due to the age of Kauai: older than the other Hawaiian islands, C. quassus had more time to adapt to a
strictly herbivorous diet. Perhaps, had the other species endured, they would
have developed similar adaptations.
The two species of Thambetochen
are surprisingly similar given their geographic distribution. Although they are
found on two entirely difference islands, the distinction between the two
species appears to be in general size. T.
chauliodous is the larger of the two species, and also possesses a shorter,
more curved bill than T. xanion of
Oahu; the latter species also displays prominent comb-like ridges in its bill.
Though T. chauliodous was present on
both Maui and Molokai, there is no obvious variation between the two
populations.
T. chauliodous
shared the island of Maui with the unfortunately-named “stumbling goose,” Ptaiochen pau. P. pau was named for “the propensity of the species to fall into
holes,” a reference to the environment in which the fossils were found, mostly
in caves and valleys. The remains of P.
pau are much more common at higher elevations than those of T. chauliodous; likewise, T. chauliodous is more common in the lowlands.
This difference in range, even on the same small island, explains how the two
species were able to avoid competition. (James & Olson, 1991)*
DNA analysis of the moa-nalos indicates that, despite
their goose-like appearance, they evolved from the same common ancestor as the
most common family of ducks, the dabblers. (Cooper et. al, 1999) These include recognizable species such as mallards
and wood ducks. Despite the weirdness of the “lost fowl,” there was one
Hawaiian duck even stranger still.
*The vast majority
of the information in this section comes from this text. It provides fantastic
detail, comments, and visuals about the moa-nalos and many more extinct
Hawaiian species. The references to this text are too numerous for me to add
without being a nuisance. Hence, this footnote.
Check back soon for the jaw-dropping, hair-raising second part of this post.
No comments:
Post a Comment